Procedural success versus clinical risk status in determining discharge of patients after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES We evaluated whether patients' clinical status, angioplasty success, or both, should guide discharge after primary angioplasty (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Current guidelines do not address a discharge strategy for AMI patients undergoing successful PCI. METHODS Patients who underwent PCI in Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies (N = 3,188) were classified as "high clinical risk" if they had either age >70 years, Killip class >1, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, anterior MI, or left bundle branch block, and as "low clinical risk" if none was present. Successful PCI patients were compared with those with unsuccessful PCI in both groups for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS Percutaneous coronary intervention was successful in 668 (90%) of 745 low-risk clinical and 2,104 (86%) of 2,443 high-risk clinical patients. Regardless of clinical risk status, patients with successful PCI had lower 30-day MACE than those with unsuccessful PCI (low-risk group: 4.6% vs. 22%, p < 0.0001; high-risk group: 7% vs. 21%; p < 0.0001). Moreover, successful PCI patients with either risk status had few MACE after day 4, whereas unsuccessful PCI patients had more MACE. The success of PCI was the strongest independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.0). A constellation of three or more high-risk clinical features also predicted higher 30-day MACE (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.12). CONCLUSIONS The success of PCI is the prime determinant of clinical outcome after PCI for AMI. The majority of AMI patients with less than three high-risk clinical features who undergo successful PCI may be discharged from the hospital by day 4. In contrast, patients with more than two high-risk clinical features or unsuccessful PCI may need longer observation.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of the Success Rate of Treatment with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention PCI versus Thrombolytic Treatment in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Local Hospitals in Iran
Background and Objective: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is caused due to coronary artery occlusion and divided into two forms of ST-elevation (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction. This study aimed to determine the success rate of treatment with primary PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) versus thrombolysis in the establishment of perfusion and to evaluate the sho...
متن کاملA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Treatment of Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
thrombolytic therapy, an appropriate treatment option , if primary angioplasty is not available for the treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction patients in the early hours after the onset of the symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the tenecteplase drug vs alteplase in the treatment of STEMI patients. We searched the PubMed, cochrane library, Web Of ...
متن کاملEffectiveness of tenecteplase versus streptokinase in treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis
Background: Thrombolytic therapy, an appropriate treatment option, if primary angioplasty is not available for the treatment of these patients in the early hours after the onset of the symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of new tenecteplase (TNKase) drug vs. streptokinase in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in Iran. M...
متن کاملTenecteplase versus reteplase in acute myocardial infarction: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death throughout the world. One of the standard approaches to treatment of AMI is fibrinolysis. The study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of tenecteplase versus reteplase through network meta-analysis for AMI. Methods: Randomized trials were comprehensively searched in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, a...
متن کاملTenecteplase versus reteplase in acute myocardial infarction: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death throughout the world. One of the standard approaches to treatment of AMI is fibrinolysis. The study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of tenecteplase versus reteplase through network meta-analysis for AMI. Methods: Randomized trials were comprehensively searched in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
دوره 44 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004